Tag Archives: complexity theory

Existence is subsistence

Posted on July 20, 2012 by

The title for this post “existence is subsistence” is an idea that was highlighted by the scientist Emanuel Swedenborg. We can find observable evidence for this “law” in all biological systems in which every living cell (and every part of … Continue reading →

Posted in love, psychology, Reality, science, unity | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Heptaparaparshinokh

Posted on June 19, 2012 by

“Heptaparaparshinokh” is the term spiritual teacher George Gurdjieff used to refer to the universal law of seven. This law of sevenfoldness is ubiquitous in all coherent processes of nature when things are viewed as comprehensive wholes and unities. Gurdjieff sometimes … Continue reading →

Posted in god, Inner growth, metaphysics, psychology, Reality, religion, science, spirituality, symbolism, unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Love and Spiritual Bio-Complexity

Posted on September 16, 2010 by

The science of complexity theory is in its infancy. It deals with nature’s incessant behavior and drive towards creating complicated and organized systems. Nature—whether you believe it drives itself towards this trajectory or is driven by a Divine Creator—has nevertheless … Continue reading →

Posted in god, Inner growth, love, psychology, Reality, religion, science, spirituality, unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Evolution, Complexity Theory, and Love

Posted on July 20, 2009 by

The creation of the world is a story of Nature’s incessant drive towards self-organization. Evolution continues this pattern of complexification through bio-organization and speciation. The most complex living structure in the universe is the human brain. No one doubts that … Continue reading →

Posted in god, Inner growth, Life after death, love, metaphysics, psychology, Reality, religion, science, spirituality, unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Is Love more important than Physics?

Posted on March 13, 2009 by

Nobel Laureate physicist Richard Feynman was once asked by a friend’s mother why physics was important. He told her that physics was not important, only love was. I find great irony in Feynman’s statement. I would have told the friend’s … Continue reading →

Posted in god, love, metaphysics, psychology, Reality, religion, science, unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Love Is Ultimate Substance

Posted on February 17, 2008 by

The world is in need of a more enlightened view of what love is. The strategy I will use for unifying science and religion in my next book, “Proving God,” is to make a new ontological pronouncement about love. Love … Continue reading →

Posted in love, psychology, Reality, religion, science, unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments