Why Scripture has TWO Creation Stories

Last Saturday night, I was listening to the Coast-to-Coast AM radio show hosted by Ian Punnett. His guest, “Bible expert” Dr. Bart Ehrman, represented a new breed of theologian who dismissed the inerrancy of Holy Scripture by pointing out discrepancies in its stories, discrepancies that often pass unnoticed to the causal reader.

Dr. Ehrman has written several successful books addressing these inconsistencies.

For instance, it was pointed out in the interview that Scripture contains TWO creation stories, which were irreconcilably different. They certainly are different.

Because of these inconsistencies, the guest theologian has surmised that these various interpretations of events must have been the logical result of different authors, often separated by hundreds of years, expressing their subjective points of view.

The bottom line is that the stories of Scripture were not the result of direct communications from God in heaven to those on earth who penned these accounts.

What I found amusing (if not laughable) was that the guest author seemed to think that the academic world had a better sense of what is ontologically real than those with simple faith. I am not merely defending the historical accuracy of Scripture but rather its sacred inerrancy. Factual history and biblical inerrancy are two different issues.

“Huh?” you say.

Enter scientist/theologian Emanuel Swedenborg. He discovered that Holy Scripture is a multi-dimensional document and that a proper interpretation requires the human mind to make distinct jumps in cognitive function. In other words, the literal interpretation of Scripture and the issue of salvation (soteriology) offer more than meets the eye—even a scholarly eye.

Swedenborg pointed out that since God’s Word had its origins in heaven, the literal meaning of its stories were derived from an a priori spiritual world, which is not under the constraints of spacetime laws. In other words, the narratives of Scripture, on a deeper fundamental level, contain ontological abstraction by which physical and worldly qualities correspond to and are analogs of non-material spiritual realities.

Swedenborg devoted many volumes to interpreting these higher meanings within God’s Holy Word, including Genesis, Exodus and Revelation (with various references to the Gospels).

The Bible contains two creation stories because the first version addresses, symbolically, the spiritual evolution of humankind. The simple phrase “Let there be light,” when interpreted from its psycho-spiritual equivalent, means let there be “understanding.” The second version of creation addresses humankind’s fall. When interpreted spiritually, the Garden of Eden depicts a psychoscape and represents a state of wisdom reached by humans who followed the precepts of divine order. Their removal from Eden was not a physical event—it was their removal from wisdom.

A psychoscape is the inner “turf” of one’s heart and mind. It is the “theater” of human dispositions and choices, which are a person’s true spirit.

Swedenborg claimed that those who are the most educated often have a harder time accepting and raising their cognitive function to embrace the higher levels of meaning in Scripture than the faithful and the simple.

Swedenborg encouraged more creativity in biblical interpretation—not from radical pluralism but from the precise science of correspondences. My new book Proving God will not only address the issues of biblical interpretation in a post-modern world, but show how science and theology can be unified by a more profound understanding of the spiritual dynamics intrinsic to God’s Holy Word and its sacred architecture.

And yes, my new book will address the important question of why we suffer.

Website: http://www.provinggod.com

Advertisements

About thegodguy

EDWARD F. SYLVIA, M.T.S. Philosopher/Theologian Edward F. Sylvia attended the School of Visual Arts in New York and received his Master of Theological Studies at the Pacific School of Religion in Berkeley, CA and a Certificate of Swedenborgian Studies from the Swedenborgian House of Studies. He is a member of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences (C.T.N.S.) and the Swedenborg Scientific Association (S.S.A.). Award-winning author of "Sermon From the Compost Pile: Seven Steps Toward Creating An Inner Garden" and "Proving God," which fulfills a continuing vision that God’s fingerprints of love can be found everywhere in the manifest universe. His most recent book, "Swedenborg & Gurdjieff: The Missing Links" is an edgy collection of anti-intuitive essays for personal transformation that challenges and inspires. He has been a student of the ideas of both Emanuel Swedenborg and George I. Gurdjieff for over thirty years. Read more about TheGodGuy, his books and his ideas at http://www.staircasepress.com
This entry was posted in god, Inner growth, Life after death, love, metaphysics, psychology, Reality, religion, science, spirituality, symbolism, unity and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Why Scripture has TWO Creation Stories

  1. ggw_bach says:

    uncanny. you know, I just listened to this episode of Coast to Coast. Was surprised when he turned up as a guest; I heard him in an interview on NPR about a month ago … and he turns up with Ian Punnett! the full 3 hours gave him much greater time to explain his position and findings.

    I’m glad that you will make a response to him in your book; while he is reasoned and logical, he really does miss the spiritual and emotional effect of religion.

    peace, ggw

  2. thegodguy says:

    Dear ggw_bach,

    Thank you for your positive response.

    If Holy Scripture is truly the Word of God then it must somehow contain God’s INFINITE Wisdom. The only way infinite wisdom can occupy a finite book is if it has ever-deeper levels of meaning and contains the patterning principles of all process within the dynamical universe and its different degrees of complexity.

    My new book “Proving God,” which will be available to the general public in about a month, addresses all these important issues.

    Spiritually yours,
    TheGodGuy

  3. Jacqui Komschlies says:

    So, are you agreeing with Swedenborg? Or, are you saying “yes, but” in that yes, there are levels upon levels of meaning and “let there be understanding” is quite true – but, the literal “let there be light” is also true?

    • thegodguy says:

      Dear Jacqui,

      I am agreeing with Swedenborg, who stated that God’s Holy Word consisted of THREE principle levels of meaning – a literal meaning, a psycho-spiritual meaning, and a divine meaning (which addresses the details of glorification, that is, how Jesus Christ united His human nature with His divine nature). Most people find it hard to believe that Holy Scripture communicates beyond the literal level. The literal level serves as a container for the two higher levels so that there is a correspondence and harmony between all three levels. This correspondence is not dependent on the historical facts of world history or the process of creation.

      Spiritually yours,
      TheGodGuy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s